[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments by DougChatham
Query about the S-Pawning Queen: When you say 'available space', do you mean <i>any</i> empty space on the board, or did you mean to say 'empty space adjacent to the Queen'?
<p>
Inquiring minds want to know.
Charles,<p>
Marriage can occur even if the Queen is in danger of immediate capture.<p>
Best wishes,<br>
Doug Chatham
Well, then, if both sides are in checkmate they have a equal chance of winning ;-)
There are some Star Trek 3-D Chess sets being sold on Ebay. The prices are, of course, astronomical :-)
Anyone have comments on the new rules proposals, or at least the proposals made since the last time we adopted a New Rule?
That last proposal Robert is waiting for was emailed to the Camel Chess voters around June 8.
<p>It reads as follows:
<p>11. [Entrant 7] When a player captures part of their opponent's Tower of
Hanoi, they may optionally remove another part of it of equal or lesser
height from anywhere on the board.
I believe the point of that last condition is to prevent castling with any Rooks that are created on the eighth row by Pawn promotion.
No.
<p>Consider the White Pawn in front of the White King. Suppose White somehow gets that Pawn to the 8th rank and promotes it to a White Rook. The 'same rank' condition prevents White from 'castling' his King with his new Rook.
According to Article 5.6(d) of the Laws of Chess (at <a href='http://www.chessvariants.com/fidelaws.html'>http://www.chessvariants.com/fidelaws.html</a>), when a pawn reaches the last rank, it <b> must </b> promote immediately.
You can see the initial setup on the PBM preset page for Aberg's variation <a href='/play/pbm/play.php?submit=Preview&game=Aberg+variation+of+Capablanca+Chess&rules=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chessvariants.com%2Flarge.dir%2Fcapablancavariation.html&group=Chess&set=alfaerie&board=10.01.&code=ranbqkbnmrpppppppppp40PPPPPPPPPPRANBQKBNMR&patterns=%3A+%21*&cols=10&colors=339933+CCCC11+22BB22&hexcolors=red+green+blue+orange+yellow+indigo+violet+cyan+magenta+black&player=White&first=White&files=&ranks=&bcolor=111199&tcolor=EEEE22&bsize=16&shape=square'>here</a> The new pieces go between the rooks and knights.
There doesn't seem to be much of a consensus about what to do about the Towers of Hanoi. My opinions:<br>
1. A Tower can split and attack in the same move.<br>
2. A Tower may split and merge in the same move.<br>
3. An Eaglet can only promote to a Tower if flanked on both sides by Towers of the same size. Also, the Eaglet promotes to a Tower of the same size as those Towers flanking it.<br>
4. We should have a vote to choose among the various options that have been mentioned.
Oops,forgot one issue.<br>
5. Eight is the maximum height of a Tower of Hanoi.
The description of the Eaglet needs to be updated to be consistent with our new promotion rule.
Well, the current version of the Laws of Chess at <a href='http://www.fide.com/official/handbook.asp?level=EE101'>http://www.fide.com/official/handbook.asp?level=EE101</a> says
in Article 9.2,
<BLOCKQUOTE>
Positions are not the same if a pawn that could have been captured en passant can no longer be captured or if the right to castle has been changed temporarily or permanently. </BLOCKQUOTE>
So the answer to both your questions seems to be No.
(By the way, the link to the FIDE Handbook is broken and needs updating.)
It's possible to lose this game -- that is, there are starting arrangements from which it's impossible to get the knights to the other side. For an example, consider<p>
- B q K<br>
b r r b<br>
B R Q k<br>
N n n N<br>
<br>
In fact, the player cannot make any moves at all!
<p>I wonder if there are losing starting arrangements where the player has some moves available.
I'd suggest the following, if nobody else has come up with notation:<p>
O-O for castling to the player's left. (At most one king can castle to the left on any particular turn, so there is no ambiguity.)<p>
O-O-O for castling to the player's right. (Again, at most one king can do this at any particular time.)<p>
OO-OO, or perhaps 2O-O, for the double-castling move.
Hmmm...how about a 44-square Hecatomb-like variant where each side gets a King, an Alibaba, and 20 promotable Thieves? Call it something like 'The Game of Forty Thieves' :)
Well, there are <i>many</i> alternative problems we could look at. For example, replace the Queens with Amazons. (See <a href='http://www.durangobill.com/N_Queens.html'>http://www.durangobill.com/N_Queens.html </a>for some results on putting n Amazons --he calls them Superqueens -- on an nxn board, with no pawns.)<p>
For more problems involving combinations on chessboards, see <blockquote>S.M. Hedetniemi, S.T. Hedetniemi and R. Reynolds, Combinatorial problems on chessboards: II, Chapter 6 in Domination in Graphs: Advanced Topics, T.W. Haynes, S.T. Hedetniemi and P.J. Slater, Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 133-162 (1998).
</blockquote>
Boris Badenov was a villian in an old American cartoon series called 'The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show'. The heroes were Bullwinkle, a talking moose, and Rocky, a talking flying squirrel.<p>
So I doubt 'Badenov' gave his real name....
The following answer can be found near the end of <a href='http://www.chessvariants.com/d.chess/matefaq.html'>http://www.chessvariants.com/d.chess/matefaq.html</a>:
<blockquote>
<h3>If I call checkmate falsely do I forfeit the game?</h3><p>
No. When done accidentally, there is no consequence; the game just continues. <p>
When done on purpose, then an arbiter could punish you, as this would be a case of distracting the opponent, and/or making unreasonable claims.
</blockquote>
Here's a long list of references on N-queens problems:<p>
<a hhref='http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~kosters/nqueens.html'>
http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~kosters/nqueens.html</a>
One more comment: there is a 2-player version of this
puzzle. Players take turns placing Queens on an
n x n chessboard such that no Queen is attacked. If a player has no more
unattacked squares to put a Queen on, that player loses.<p>
The game is called the Queen's Independence Game. See item 4 of
<a href='http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~hedet/domination.html'>
http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~hedet/domination.html</a> for more details.
So how do you get the pawns out of the way of the pieces in the back row?
I wonder why there are so few entries for this contest.
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.