I've restructured the page to flow more consistently: the pawns are still the last of the non‐royal pieces discussed but are now grouped with the other colour‐dependent morhpers, which means the Bishop is now described first; the unorthodox moves are now all described in a single block at the end of the page; both (down from all three) morphing tables are in the condensed form describing square‐dependent states rather than transitions.
I've left most of the other text intact (except a typo ‘Kight’ and the description of the DH's move, which is more in line with the others but feel free to adjust it if you prefer to express it differently).
Please tell me if you're happy to go with the edits I've made; if so (and subject to any other adjustments you may wish to make — e.g. to the description of the DH or if you want to have the tables as images similar in style to the ones you made previously) I'm happy to publish
I've restructured the page to flow more consistently: the pawns are still the last of the non‐royal pieces discussed but are now grouped with the other colour‐dependent morhpers, which means the Bishop is now described first; the unorthodox moves are now all described in a single block at the end of the page; both (down from all three) morphing tables are in the condensed form describing square‐dependent states rather than transitions.
I've left most of the other text intact (except a typo ‘Kight’ and the description of the DH's move, which is more in line with the others but feel free to adjust it if you prefer to express it differently).
Please tell me if you're happy to go with the edits I've made; if so (and subject to any other adjustments you may wish to make — e.g. to the description of the DH or if you want to have the tables as images similar in style to the ones you made previously) I'm happy to publish