[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments by JaredMcComb
So basically, any neutral piece that is attacking any non-neutral piece becomes yours at the end of your turn?
Okay, I get it now. Thanks for your help, guys. It's a great idea but I'll have to try it out before I can give it a proper rating.
Oooh, I like this idea! Can someone ZRFolize it?
So it looks like Looney Labs is discontinuing the single-color stashes in favor of their new 'Treehouse' system. Single-color stashes will still be available in their online store, while supplies last - but they do have Cyan available. Linkage: http://www.looneylabs.com/whybuy/treehouse.html
I am considering a 9x9 version of this game. In the meantime I encourage people to play this one and give me their thoughts.
Yes, I probably could -- if I could program Zillions files.
The zebra has stripes but the tiger has none... ???
'Wow, let's use really big numbers to try to impress people!'
I've just received a custom Omega chessboard which I ordered awhile back. It is made of quarter-inch plywood, laser-etched and stained. I hope to post some pictures soon, especially if there is any interest. ;)
I already had an Omega set, so of course I had the pieces for it. I
ordered a board because the cardboard board that came with the set has
been used so much that it is starting to fall apart.
As for cost, it was... expensive. ;)
Poor in part to counteract the excellent, but mostly because that is my opinion. The game is needlessly complicated and too confusing to learn, and in addition, the page and diagram are just plain ugly. And I believe Andy is correct in saying that Nicholls' arguments are both condescending and outrageous, although I'm not sure that the LoTR series qualifies as 'second-rate.' (I really need to go read 'em...) At the community college that I graduated from, there was a student association called 'Writers' Guild,' where students and faculty could bring things that they had written and get opinions on them. The one major rule there was, after reading something you wrote, you couldn't defend it while other people critiqued - and it WORKED. I believe that this community could almost definitely improve if people here acted by this rule for a while after their articles are posted.
'As a final note, a 'you can't reply to criticism to your game' rule would stop a lot of flame wars here. Then again, it would also give trolls who just want to hurt people's feelings more power.' Which is why it shouldn't be strictly enforced - the Internet is much more open than a small room with a dozen people in it and so there should be a little leeway, or an option to disregard the thing altogether. And besides, if a game is truly good, it will show through peoples' opinions, not through some interweb troll's offensive comment.
To Mr. Gilman: there is a reason that I suggested people try to disclude Recognized variants. ;)
There is a typo in the diagram - one player has no Silver - and by 'W' you mean Lance, right? Haven't tried it yet but it seems that the large number of long-range pieces will overpower the game more than in Yonin Shogi. Plus it doesn't have the rules Yonin does about handling check and mate, which IMO is the best way to do it - but on the other hand, entirely removing the pieces of a defeated player from play seems like it might make the endgame more interesting and help control the large number of long-range pieces. (Question: are the mated player's in-hand pieces also retired from play?)
...So what happens if you stick a Tardis inside another Tardis? :P
I wonder whether this concept would work better in a hexagonal setting...
All dragons move exactly as they did in the third zone before promotion. Promotion to a dragon effectively allows third-zone moves to be made outside of said zone.
Oh neat, someone made a preset for this! :) I'd appreciate it if people who try this out could post their thoughts on how well it plays.
Yes, pawns may make a double-step opening. In fact, en passant is disallowed for this very reason - since the board is 7x7 instead of 8x8, it could happen much more frequently, and I did not want this.
Yes, that is correct. Only Shogi pieces can be held and dropped.
Do squares become painted-over as pieces move off of them multiple times?
If a Diplomat reaches the other side when the opponent has no pieces in reserve, then nothing happens.
What would be the point? Half the squares would be useless because the pieces on them wouldn't be able to attack the King, which leaves a game which is topologically equivalent to an orthogonal-only one.
The pawns are FIDE pawns. They may only promote to lost pieces. So, in that case, you could only promote to silver.
I have to wonder whether this game would benefit from adapting Yonin's ruleset (specifically, when a player is checked, it's their turn next). If you did this, then I guess whoever checkmated either player first would win, since in free-for-all Yonin you have to be in control of three out of four armies to win. Alternatively, instead of just passing the turn to a checked player - if a player is checked "out of order" simply reverse the turn order. But that might be too confusing in the long run. Also, I haven't ever played any games that use this other particular option, but I like it in principle: without using either of the above rules, what if you won if the player to your left (the one after you) was checkmated?
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.