[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
[Removed dead link. Essay has been unpublished.]
I respect your conclusions about Chess flaws. I disagree with some of them, I have not a clearly thought position about a few, and I may agree with other points, but, generally, I am sure other people can have another opinions, perfectly valid as yours, because there is much subjective appretiation inmerse, so I accept your opinions as yours and of all who may completely agree with you, but not as an absolute conclusion. My position: Game design is an artistic manifestation. There are not such things as 'Good design' or 'Bad design'. These concepts are, as much, statistical, according to appretiation of majorities. To the rest, 'Good' or 'Bad' are absolutelly personal opinions about a single artistic design.
Derek, you several times use the word 'intransigent' where I think you mean 'intrinsic' or 'inherent.' Please consult a dictionary and see whether you want to edit your essay. You make some interesting points, but this is all in the realm of personal taste. Games are essentially frivolous, and some people can't be bothered with a game unless it features imperfect information and is played for a stake.
Please note that I intentionally used the word 'intransigent' thrice in association with the word 'dilemma'. I sought (with insufficient clarity that is my fault) a more thoroughgoing meaning than 'intrinsic' would convey since a dilemma cannot be driven out of existence via adjusting the limited factors within one's control to one extreme or the other. Ultimate causes can be overlooked with effects misidentified as causes when trying to minimize game-design problems. YES, people who seek games which are a mixture of luck and skill, probably for the purposes of gambling, are after something we do not offer- an opportunity to wreck their lives!
very interesting indeed, and courageous too i guess, saying at a chess site that chess is flawed lol. i think giving the alfil the power of bishop and throwing a piece like the queen in the game has greatly made chess unstable, would you agree on that? (not to mention the double pawn move rule). what do you think of the openning set up of 4 player chaturanga?
6 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.