Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

this chess variant is very good,yet very puzzling!
If you could, you would've gotten more color-type armies to make the game
even MORE puzzling (just a suggestion)
P.S.create a sequel to this chess variant!

this game is so bent i can't understand it at all, but it reads extremely
interesting, to say the least .. check out here, direct link to game
explanation - http://www.geocities.com/chessdp/ttchsrules.htm
now how bizzare is this explanation of the game!
How can i rate a game i can't understand, pfft, it is so easy :))

I really like the idea of the game. I think it is very thought-through and
revolutionary.
I only think that the definition of check and checkmate should be altered,
so grammatical incorrectness is prevented as is King-capture in western
chess.

i.e.:
A player is in check if he is under one-move-threat of having no
(travelled)king while his opponent has a resoluted position.
A player is also in check if he is under one-move-threat of having a
grammatically incorrect position.
If the one-move-threat is not answerable, the player is also in checkmate
and looses the game.

This definition provides final positions that are always grammatically
correct.

In my opinion this rule would be more chess-like. What do you think?

Around a year ago i posted ..

aww this external link now doesn't work, i wanted to just look again at the rules of this game, is Danny Purvis still around, or, omg, is this game 'lost in time'? 

Well i found the page, and forgot to post. Anyone who has not read this description of this game should have a look, it is amazing. Here is the link .. http://www.wgosa.org/ttchsrules.htm

Could an editor please fix the link given on this page, thanks!

oh this link is to do with the game also
http://www.wgosa.org/ttchsglos.htm

sorry, this is the best link.

http://www.wgosa.org/ttchs.htm