Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
Is this variant a recent invention or is there an historical context? I don't understand. It is said "I dramatized Sin-yeon-sang-hui", but what is Sin-yeon-sang-hui?
Thank you
ๆฐๆผ่ฑกๆฑๅ่ชช - ์ ์ฐ์ํฌ๋์ค
โ
ไฝไนๆดๅผตไนๅฅ้ๅ่ทฏ, ๆทปไนไปฅ็่็
่็่ก็ฐ ็่กๆ, ๅๅๆทปไบ ๆฏ่้ฒๆไธ่ทฏ
ๆผๆฏไนๅไนๆธๅๅๅ่็จๅ ตไน่กไบฆๅฏ่ฌๅๆฅตๅ ถๅฆ็ฃ
๋ด๊ฐ ๊ทธ๊ฒ(์ฅ๊ธฐ)์ ์๋กญ๊ฒ ๋ณํํด ๋ณด์๋ค.
์ฐ์ 4๊ฐ์ ๊ธธ์ ๋ ๋๋ฆฌ๊ณ , ์ฐ(็)์ ์(็)๋ผ๋ ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ์ ์ถ๊ฐํ๋ค.
์ฐ(็)๋ ๋ฐญ์ (็ฐ)์๋ก ์์ง์ด๊ณ , ์(็)๋ ๋๋ชฉ(็ฎ)์๋ก ์์ง์ธ๋ค.
์กธ(ๅ)์ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 2๊ฐ์ฉ ์ถ๊ฐํ๋๋ฐ, ์ด์ ๊ณผ ๋ค๋ฅด๊ฒ ํ๋์ ๊ธธ๋ง ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ค.
์ด์ ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ์ ์๊ฐ 44๊ฐ๋ก ๋์ด๋ ์ฉ๋ณ์ ์ญ์ ๊ทธ ์ค๋ฌํจ์ด ๊ทน์ ๋ฌํ๋ค.
โ
Source : ้้ปๅ ้ - ์ ๋ฌต๋น์ง (1776)
If you want to, search the word ์ ๋ฌต๋น์ง in https://kyu.snu.ac.kr/
When Cannon captures the Rhino, the text "I win!" appears. But it's not a checkmate situation at all. What error is this?
When you do not explicitly specify a royal piece through a parameter royal=N, the diagram assumes the last piece in the list is the royal one. In this case that is the Rhino. By default the diagram assumes extinction royalty. So when the diagram captures the second Rhino, it assumes it won the game.
Either re-order your piece lines in the diagram definition so that the King is last, or add a line royal=8.
Ahh thanks !
Afaict, it looks like Sin-yeon-sang-hui is a historical Janggi variant (though my Korean is nonexistent so I can't confirm any of what Daphne posted), and this is a backโformation (โdramatisedโ is probably Google Translate or equivalent) of an an equivalent Xiaฬngqiฬโderived variant.
Presumably the Korean original has no river and Koreanโstyle cannons/advisors/generals
SYSG (Sin-yeon-sang-gi) is a version adapted from SYSH (Sin-yeon-sang-hui), one of the historical variant of Janggi, in Xiangqi style. In the SYSH, there is no river, and instead of Xiangqi's Cannon, Janggi's Cannon exists. Also, The deployment will also be different from this one
I think Sin-yeon-sang-hui is not well known for Westerners. Daphne, Would you be so kind to make also a page for this one, with the historical data theatre known? This is very interesting
Okay ! I'll do it later!
ูฉ(หแห*)ู
I published this with some slight edits. I unchecked Historical from the categories, because I believe this is an original invention by the author that is based on a historical variant. I unchecked Multiplayer and Wargame, because it appears to be a normal two-player Chess variant.
11 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
๏ปฟ๏ปฟ
Can this be published ?