[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
Let me amend my request for bug-reports by asking you to report them here rather than by email. This will help cut down on redundant bug-reports.
Minor bug: On the Chinese Chess preset, the available pieces list cannot find the gifs for BSage2 amd WSage2.
I am looking for a person or two outside my circle of play testers to play a game of a chess variation I have created. In this variant the two sides have pieces and pawns with different characteristics and capabilities. White has pawns, pieces, an initial placement, and moves in accord with the rules of orthodox chess. For Black, with the exception of their Kings, every playing piece moves differently from any piece found in orthodox chess. This variant is played on an 8x8 board and can be played with a standard chess set by substituting pieces as described in the rules. Years ago, a lot of them, at my best, my chess rating was 1620 to give you an idea of my chess strength. My objective is to “triple-check” the play balance of this very asymmetric chess variation. I am looking for someone who can make at least a few moves most days. If you are interested post here with your email address and I will send you a copy of version 1.09 of the rules.
Why don't you check the balance of the different armies by having a computer play a few thousand games against itself? I don't know if your variant contains any unorthodox pieces with side effects, but if they are merely pieces that move differently, you could easily do this with Fairy-Max. With Human testers it will be almost impossible to get a number of games high enough to draw a statistically meaningful conclusion. Especially as Humans will need quite some practice before they can play the game at a reasonable level.
5 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.