Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

An interesting idea. Likely excellent. Not necessarily suitable for games of maneuver with shortrange pieces, but an idea that might transpose well to Grand Chess, say. It also gives ideas for new pieces, say a Q-3, or an out-and-out time bomb, something that explodes and takes out the squares around it after 2 or 3 moves. Handicapping would also be easier here. Weak pieces could get more moves. You might design a 'Vampire' piece that would suck moves from a neighboring piece or three, but starting with just 1 or 2 moves. You might even have a 'life station' where you could fill up on moves. It certainly allows for trading of moves back and forth - allow a move and a trade per turn. Heck, allow 1 trade between neighbors and 1 move per side per turn in 6hess, and castling could give you a source of available moves, as a castled king with pawns should not need a lot of moves immediately, and that could be your 'filling station' spot. You get a real chess economy - one based on the only thing a chess piece values, moves.

'...the only thing a chess piece values, moves.' I'll add captures, checks, pocketing / drops and mates to that....

This may have been the David Howe game I had in mind, Multimove Chess which itself regards Cost Progressive Chess as a forebear. I have sent you both an invite to play this with me. The idea behind Multimove Chess shares with 6hess a beauty in proportion of movement in relation to board size and could be very helpful in making some of these larger variants we are making more functional and exciting, no?

[Added note: Though 6hess was posted a little later than Multimove Chess, Adrian and I were playing it earlier, so it seems the two concepts - in fact different from one another - were possibly being developed around the same time.]