Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order Later
VaoQi. XiangQi with Vaos. (9x10, Cells: 90) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
💡📝HaruN Y wrote on Sat, Aug 17 07:17 AM UTC:

8 of my 9 unpublished submissions are ready to be published.


Bn Em wrote on Thu, Aug 22 06:02 PM UTC in reply to HaruN Y from Sat Aug 17 07:17 AM:

Are we to guess which one isn't? ;‌)


💡📝HaruN Y wrote on Thu, Aug 22 07:59 PM UTC in reply to Bn Em from 06:02 PM:

I posted that when my Restrictima was still WIP (but not private).

I think they're all ready now.


H. G. Muller wrote on Mon, Oct 28 09:05 AM UTC:

Well, this one might already have been published, but the Diagram in it is awful: the board background image is not properly aligned with the pieces, and furthermore already has (oriental style) pieces on it.

It could be that I just uncovered this, as I finally managed to fix the use of background images in the Interactive Diagram. It appears that someone had installed a style file that globally broke all Diagrams on the site by defining a background color in table row (<tr>) elements. Which covered the background image the Diagram used for the <table>. I now discovered that explicitly specifying the <tr> background color as 'inherit' is a way to counter-act that. So all background images are now visible again.


💡📝HaruN Y wrote on Mon, Oct 28 12:01 PM UTC in reply to H. G. Muller from 09:05 AM:

It's aligned now.


H. G. Muller wrote on Mon, Oct 28 04:23 PM UTC in reply to HaruN Y from 12:01 PM:

Indeed, this is better. But the background image still has the pieces in it, and in orthodox Xiangqi version (i.e. without Vaos). I would think this still is a fatal flaw...


Aurelian Florea wrote on Wed, Oct 30 09:54 AM UTC:

The problem with adding diagonal pieces to Xiangqi, is that they are, for lack of a better word, not needed. That because the king has only orthogonal moves. So the diagonal pieces seem overpowered.


💡📝HaruN Y wrote on Wed, Oct 30 10:19 AM UTC in reply to Aurelian Florea from 09:54 AM:

I like adding things that are not needed.

Isn't it because the defensive pieces only move diagonally that they are bad at defending against non-orthogonal attacks?


Aurelian Florea wrote on Wed, Oct 30 11:19 AM UTC in reply to HaruN Y from 10:19 AM:

That actually, too.


🔔Notification on Mon, Nov 11 12:43 PM UTC:

The author, HaruN Y, has updated this page.


10 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.