Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

I'm not sure I understand the question 'What happens when the star returns
to its throne.'  The rules clearly state that once in the dungeon, the
star can only move to adjacent dungeon cells and can never return to the
weave, so it can therefore never return to its starting square, if that is
what the questioner meant by 'throne.'  At least, this is how I read the
situation.

I now see that my response to the question 'What happens when a Star comes
back to his throne? (after cycling d2 or f2).' was off base, since I had
not read the rules completely enough, and is properly answered by Mr.
Troyka.  I promise to be more careful before I respond in the future.

Excellent game. The idea of a semi-3D board is very nice.

I found two errors in the ZRF-file.
1. At the end of the tri-weave macro: The line before the last line
missed
a (recycle)

  else (if not-friend? (recycle) add))
instead of
  else (if not-friend? add))

2. In the recycle macro also counts captured Diamonds as captured
Pentagons

  else
  (if (piece? Pentagon)
  (counter Pentagon1 Pentagon2)
  ))))
instead of
  else
  (counter Pentagon1 Pentagon2)
  )))

And one question:
The ZRF-file does not allow a Diamond-move to the last rank if there is
no
piece to promote to. Is this correct?

Thanks for the comments and for posting the fixes to the errors.  I've
sent the editors a ZRF version 1.2 correcting the two bugs you identified
and giving the Diamonds the ability to advance to the far rank --
remaining a Diamond -- if there is no piece to rescue.  This raises the
question of whether a Diamond on a slope on the far rank should be able to
rescue (assuming a piece to rescue has become available) when making a
lateral capture.  Currently that's not permitted.

I found another bug in the tri-weave macro

  (if (and (on-board? $2) (not-friend? $2)) (recycle) $2 add $3)

is not right. The (recycle) is not executed at the position on which the
possible capture takes place, so it has to be:

  (if (and (on-board? $2) (not-friend? $2)) $2 (recycle) add $3)

The same correction for the same line with $2 <--> $3 a few lines lower.

9x9.  Here's a theorem by Niels Henrik Abel (Abelian set, group, integral) on convergence of series in 1826:     
 0 = 1^n - 2^n + 3^n - 4^n + etc.,  n positive integer.  Here's a poem by Mark Stroud (slashes are lines): ''In a field/ I am the absence/ of field./ This is/ always the case./ Wherever I am/ I am what is missing./ When I walk/ I part the air/ and always/ the air moves in/ to fill the spaces/ where my body's been./ We all have reasons/ for moving./ I move/ to keep things whole.''  How to slice, like apple or pizza, the 10*3 CVs from 'ECV' and 'CVP'? Any 100 of them, like Gilman's or Betza's, are 1%. To evaluate we need subsets of 10 to 200 to compare, in other words, 0.1% up to 2%. Criteria can be any of locale of invention, board size, number piece-types, power density, year invention, gender, shape, geometry, theme, number mutators, winning conditions . Take sizing's '9x9', containing about 50 CVs, 0.5%. Surprisingly there are 25 Very Good/Excellent within 9x9, a disproportionate 50%. Previously reviewed, Weave & Dungeon   uniquely has Circle, Star, Triangle, Square, Pentagon, Diamond.