Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
GeneM wrote on Sat, Jan 19, 2008 03:50 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
Ken,

In the introduction to your Baseline Fischer Chess, I do not see any
description of the theoretical justification of this variant. In other
words, what problem is this nuanced variation of FRC trying to solve? Or
what additional benefit is it trying to gain?

RANDOM OR DELIBERATE?
The rule description is too vague: Is each player allowed to determine his
own setup on his back rank? I hope not. If not, then this is FRC-chess960
except two setups are randomly selected instead of just one. Could be very
unfair in many individual games.

ASYMMETRIC IS LESS DRAW-ISH; LESS FAIR?
I will admit that one possible justification of asymmetric setups is that
by itself, FRC-chess960 cannot reduce the high overall draw rate in
grandmaster chess by more than a modest fraction. Asymmetric setups
*might* have a bigger reduction in the draw rate.
However, even if asymmetric is less draw-ish, it might often be because
one player started the game with a better setup before the first move is
made.

CORNER BISHOPS ARE BAD
I have come to think that Bobby made a mistake by allowing bishops to
start on corner squares. There is only one way to develop a corner bishop
(Kramnik's point); and no other piece has that problem to that degree.
FRC-chess960 has at least 40% of its games start with a corner bishop.
Sometimes interesting, more often not.

Thanks.
Gene Milener

http://www.CastleLong.com/ , FRC-chess960

Dvoretsky's take:
http://www.chesscafe.com/text/dvoretsky88.pdf

Edit Form

Comment on the page Baseline chess with Fischer rules

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.