Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To Rich Hutnik wrote on Wed, Apr 2, 2008 09:29 PM UTC:In another thread, Singh wrote: Not a member, so responding to 'Unsticking Chess' here. Regarding: 'doing all of the above should likely buy chess another 1000 years' In my opinion, not even close. As soon as someone designs a computer smart enough to improve itself, processing power explodes exponentially. The future is going to be way, way different than anything we can imagine using the current paradigm. ----------------------------------------------------- This is why I was starting a discussion on what that paradigm can be. I personally believe that the open-source method would lend well towards this, via community consensus. This could start with the chess variant crowd, and them coordinating. I am offer people a chance to discuss the IAGO Chess System as a starting point, from the drops and gating, to the classification system, to the attempt to get Capablanca pieces onto an 8x8 board. This could perhaps lead to a new paradigm. I would rather this be an opening for a discussion, rather than saying it is merely beyond what we can imagine, so why bother. Finally, I would say that all this is for more than just 'oh it lies beyond the computer'. It is for the purpose of serving the fullness of the chess community. Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID Unsticking Chess does not match any item.