Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Jeremy Lennert wrote on Fri, Aug 31, 2012 05:38 AM UTC:
Well, as long as white sometimes wins and black sometimes wins, the
"noise" is large enough to overcome all other factors SOME of the time. 
But if you collect a giant database of master-level games and find that
white is winning 53%, then I think it still makes sense to say that white
had an advantage, regardless of the theoretical perfect-game result. 
SOMETHING has to be responsible for the fact that white wins more often
than black.

So if white wins only 1% more than black, or only 0.1% more, or only 0.01%
more, at what point do you declare that the noise has "overwhelmed" the
signal and that there is now "no" advantage?  I don't see any
non-arbitrary way to draw a line anywhere other than zero exactly (i.e. the
point where the advantage passes from white to black).

So I'm assuming that the "advantage" is the hypothetical difference in
win rate between white and black that we would converge upon if we sampled
an ever-larger number of games played by "skilled" players.  The
definition of "skilled" is a bit hand-wavey and probably depends on
context, but I think the rest of that is rigorous.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.