Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
George Duke wrote on Fri, Mar 27, 2015 03:35 PM UTC:
Of course the Purpose discussion has been held off and on. The leading CV
designer Ralph Betza on related thinking your own first or second CV is the
best ever is in his comment about Chess Different Armies:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=614.
Ironically he then goes on to say there Chess Different Armies ought to
replace  boring f.i.d.e. chess.

Other purposes to make and display CVs have evolved or self-organized for
example pure artwork or case of Gridlock pure amusement.  USA GM (of problems) Vukcevich saw the ultimate replacement by sorting purpose just as Betza: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=18909 and http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=18727.  As far as Luken's "dogmatism," it is appallingly shabby that supposed leader gm Seirawan expresses surprise or even skepticism that Centaur(bn) and Champion(rn) are 400 years old in early 17th century cv, when he writes about his unimaginative Seirawan Chess.  Ignorance of their own history describes most grand-masters.  That's another implicit purpose CVPage and offshoot sites, just to tell the true history.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.