Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2022 06:02 PM UTC in reply to Greg Strong from 05:33 PM:

This is indeed rather weird. The description claims that it was played a lot, though, and I cannot imagine that for a variant that seems so obviously flawed. So I suspect there is something missing in the description. Like Aviators not being allowed to hop over each other, or over the 'hangar squares'.

There exists a ZRF file for it. Perhaps someone that has Zillions (or understands the Zillions coding language) could check it out? I am not sure whether Mats is still around; otherwise we could ask him.

[Edit] Oh, it says the Aviators are initially worth more than a Rook. And the Rooks are of course protected by their own Aviator. So perhaps it is just not smart to play AxR, like it is not smart in Xiangqi to start with CxH.

[Edit2] It is even worse: By capturing the Rook you just lose a full Aviator. The Aviator recaptures, and then your own Rook is trapped and no longer protected by an Aviator. And not protectable by anything else. (E.g. 1. Ab2xh8 Ag7xh8 2. any Ah8xa1.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Aviation Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.