Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Jean-Louis Cazaux wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2023 06:35 AM UTC:

Interesting. I understand the idea. However several moves do not appear as "natural" for me. That notion of "naturally" is certainly very subjective and depends on who considers it.

The notation is not clear for me. I would recommend a void diagram on which each cell is identified with its coordinates.

The Rook is OK for me.

The Bishop is not. I am surprised to see the cells it may reach. Moreover I am not sure to understand which path it follows to reach these cells. I recommend to show the paths as well on the diagram.

The Knight is partly strange for me. OK for the 3 cells which are not on Rook's paths, they look natural for a Knight-equivalent. For the 6 others, they are like Dabbaba-equivalent. But, why not defining the Knight as such. OK.

I have a problem with the Bishop. As the matter of fact, this lies in how you define a diagonal for a triangle. That would deserve an explanation. You speak of diagonal but not all readers will catch it. Me, I confess I don't.

Don't take bad this feedback. Again, it's interesting.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Trigonal Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.