Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Sun, Jun 23 03:56 PM UTC in reply to Michael Taktikos from 12:51 PM:

I think the rules changed at some point by adding this castling business, and that the applets play by the old rules, where a castle always decomposes. Apparently it was perceived as a flaw that castles could not be salvaged from check, or forced to decompose by zugzwang, and castling and stalemate were introduced as fixes.

I think this was a poor choice; the castling destroys the conceptual simplicity and elegance of this variant. If integral motion of a royal piece was desired, the logical solution would have been to make the king one of the atomic pieces. E.g. if de rings are designated L(arge), M and S, we could have L=K, M=B, S=R, LM=Q, MS=N, LMS=P. If you start with 8 LMS pieces, the victory condition could be that having no kings at the end of your turn loses. Your first move will create a K (leaving an N behind). A K then cannot decompose, and can capture a Q or P. It could turnover a B or N, but perhaps the rule should be that K cannot turnover, and only capture orthogonally.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Turnover

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.