Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Sat, Oct 26 08:03 AM UTC:

I fixed something that was broken. The n modifier on a W or F step, which is not useful in the normal meaning of non-jumping, was 'overloaded', and supposed to indicate that the step 'leaves behind' an e.p. square on the square it came from. This way the path of lame leapers explicitly specified as a multi-leg move could precisely indicate whether and where the piece could be e.p. captured.

The Diagram furthermore applies the rule that royals can be e.p. captured by normal capture (c) moves; the capturing piece does not need to have an explicit e mode for that, like it would need to e.p. capture non-royal pieces. This is for instance how the ban on castling out of or through check works: the castling creates e.p. squares on the King's origin, and the square it passes through. So that castling through check exposes the King to e.p. capture, and would thus be illegal.

I used this to make a Diagram for Caissa Brittania, where the royal Queen cannot move through check (nQ). Each step in the slide then created an e.p. square. But also on the origin, which would forbid moving out of check. But in Caissa Brittania moving out of check is allowed, so I suppressed generation of an e.p. square on the origin, and only left it for later steps in the slide.

This, however, broke the use of n on non-sliding W or F, where it became a complete no-op. I now fixed this. So nK would now be a King that cannot move out of check without getting e.p. captured, but moving a royal nQ out of check would still be legal.

[Edit] I am now starting to doubt the wisdom of this (irregularity-introducing) convention. If nQ would also create an e.p. square on the origin, one could still write [K?nQ] (= KyafnK) when this is not desired. OTOH, with the convention you would need [nK?nQ] (= nKnyafnK) for a royal Queen that cannot move out of check. [K?Q] is after all just synonymous for Q, but allows you to tinker the properties of the first step separately from later steps. I suppose that neither of these is particularly more complex than the other. But it bothers me that nW and nR would be treated differently as to moving out of check is concerned.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Interactive diagrams

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.