Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Gary Gifford wrote on Tue, Apr 5, 2005 09:21 PM UTC:
I can see arguements for both concepts; i.e., Mr. Smith's idea that the Barios actually need to be moved to be considered as 'defined' and the other idea (which CarlosCarlos and I are using) that indicates a piece only need to be known. So far I see no problems with the rules that CarlosCarlos and I have employed. As far as getting down to 2 Rooks, 2 Bishops, or 2 Knights, players would simply avoid that for as long as possible to keep the identities secret. In the Penswift vs. CarlosCarlos game we both now have 2 different Barios as our last Barios. [Of course, if we had a Bario of ours captured we could each get down to 1 undefined Bario... but when it moves the one in the capture Zone would be revealed to prevent it from entering the game]. Perhaps there should be 2 variations of Bario? (1) Bario,Logical Deduction Variant and (2) Bario, Quantom Variant {of course, the names could be changed). The course of time would tell us whether one was desireable over the other, or inform us perhaps, that each was equally enjoyable. Regardless of which variant (or both) surface, one thing is certainly true. The rules themselves are of a Bario language. Full of potential, but remaining undefined, or atleast defined with definitions not agreed upon by all. So, what will the final established rules be? Mr. Smith, I salute your logic. I think we are seeing the same things in Bario, just disagreeing on how our observations should be used to develop a set of standard rules.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Bario

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.