[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments by CBagleyJones
plays well, i like the 'princess' and 'warrior' pieces, good game.
well this is no doubt very interesting, amazing really. sadly, using the small graphics makes it difficult to see the pieces clearly. i think, as you say, it would be good if the different clans were different colors, this would make a lot easier. it does seem a little crowded though, once you set all the kings/clans up. it could be better to make the clans not so big, i don't know. it is just difficult to test. it could even be played on smaller board, with fewer pieces, but still, i think this is a very, very good game, highly original. well done.
so topa is in front again, half a point above anand and karjakin. 6 rounds to play. live games can be seen here, if you don't belong to a chess server that shows them .. http://www.coruschess.com/
ok i got a problem. Fergus if you are there, Roberto and i are going to start soon a couple of 'traveler' games with game courier, but the first 2 invites he sent, he didn't click on 'unrated' (these games should be unrated we think, seeing we are allowing 'back moves', and basically we just want to test this game etc) anyway, roberto told me to accept invites and then delete logs, as he has sent me 2 new invites, but now i get this line, when i try to view game logs .. Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_STRING in /home/chessva/public_html/play/pbmlogs/the_travelers/rlavieri2003-zcherryz -2006-21-502.php on line 9 so i can't see any logs or anything to do with current on going games with game courier at the moment.
looks like it's pretty obvious who broke it, doesn't it Joe :)
ok, well i wasn't ready to begin playing till end of this week anyway, Roberto, we should wait a bit then. as soon as i type 'z' the auto 'zcherryz' comes up, and it has no space after it, so i don't think prob came from my end .. we'll see what happens soon, maybe let us know when to try. thanks Fergus
this looks interesting too, i like the javelin and the way it captures and disappears after capture. i think you might have an error, to do with the pawns. you say that it captures forward (except when en passant) but if you right-click on pawn and select 'properties' it says that it can capture diagonally also. oh, i just noticed it also says in 'help' (mouse over piece to give description) that pawns capture diagonally i'll check this game out soon. edited: tough to play (for me anyway he he) .. plays good :)
now this looks a lot better with the colors, you can tell the clans apart fairly easily .. when i get time, i'll have to test this game out now.
well i didn't invent this game, Joe Joyce did, i just helped write the zrf, so i think it is ok that i rate. this is a great game, fairly similiar to shatranj, which it is based on. The alfil also has the fers move, and the fers also has the wazir move, which makes it move as a king (called a general in this game). you can also promote pawns to a lost piece, so in a sense, this game plays more dynamic than shatranj. this game is also played on game courier here.
you won't get a response. your game could go up anytime from on that day, next day, up to a week, i don't think you would wait more than a week.
a friend was saying on icc, there were gm's commenting on the topa game where he won with double exchange sac. after he did first exchange sac, they were saying he had 'over-extended' lol, ahh topa, what a hero, he is setting a cracking pace with all these wins. he is a lot different from 'drawnik' (kramnik).
ok well we got 1 game going with you as white, now to get the other going. what do you do (anyone?) if you accepted a game to play as white, but before you made a move, an 'earthquake' came along, so you closed the window. now i can't see how to make a move, clicking on email says takes me to a page that says i have accepted etc (my 2nd game with Roberto) * i can see that it says you can log on with your userid, and access your games to make a move, but when i do that, i still can't see how you can do that.
and a boring one at that ... last round coming up, topa leads anand by half a point, topa has tougher game, playing black against drawko (leko) he he :)
wow this is a very, very, very good game. beautiful graphics, trippy board, cool colors :) plays nice, only played once, but i could see how some bizzare and fun situations could arise. i'll be playing this again. nice sounds also. congrats :)
lol, yes this may be true Fergus, but how do we know you are not one of the Manabu Terao's :)
brilliant page describing heaps of fairy pieces!
i have noticed, if you click on 'Recognized Chess Variants' on this page, it takes you to a page where all the variants have a picture, and are described etc etc. now, with the game 'chaturanga for 4 players' there is this comment. 'Two player variants would be, in this theory, formed by unifying two armies, replacing the second king by a different piece.' i don't know who wrote this, but i don't think they have ever played the game. First of all, this completely destroys the 'doublemate' game. It is perfectly playable with 1 player taking 2 sides, and the other player taking 2 sides, with all kings in the game. It would stop the fun of having one army mated, and that player fighting to release from mate with their other army. Secondly, how are you going to make it balanced, where are you going to put exactly, the kings, you will have a 'king army' attacking a 'non-king' army and 'non-king' army attacking 'king-army' for one player, (or whatever) while the 2nd player won't have the same. it is a natural way of the game, that 'red' and 'yellow' are against 'black' and 'green', with red in bottom left hand corner, and red moving first, game going clockwise. red naturally attacks black, (of course can attack green, but the way the pieces are set, it is easier and natural to attack black, mainly because of the pawns) black natural attacks yellow, yellow attacks green and green attacks red, so this makes the problem of just making 2 kings. i think it must be total speculation, to say remove a king per side and add another piece, i have played the game, with one vs one, each taking 2 sides, it plays perfectly. I have never seen anywhere written this idea. it comes from a conditioned mind that chess is 1 vs 1, 1 king per side. oh and btw, red should be lower left corner, yellow is top right.
'i have a friend who moves with one hand keeping his other hand constantly over the flag, is this legal?' no, move piece and press clock with same hand
don't know, cause the inventor didn't use them in the game he made. those pieces you mention are not in many games, but, da da, you should check out my game 'sky', it has 0-3, 0-4, 4-4, 0-5 (technically, fiveleaper also has a 4-3 leap, something to do with maths or whathavenot) and 5-5 (root-fifty-leaper, also again, has 7-1 leap too).
wow this game is stunning. it's hard to find words to describe properley, but, it really is unbelievable, a work of art. apart from the 'displacer', all the pieces move fairly simply. But the gameplay is far from simple, it is extremely complex, rich in depth. Beautiful game. Roberto and i are playing 2 games on game courier for anyone interested in checking it out. It would a major disappointment if this game does not make it's way to zillions.
hmm, it has been around 6 days since joe joyce has done anything, we are playing a game, and he is playing other people too. normally if we are playing, and he is going somewhere and won't be moving for awhile, he will say something, so i am a bit concerned for him. anyone have any info about him?
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.