Ratings & Comments
Shouldn't you be able to edit your own page?
This is the 111th comment in this comments section!
I've never posted my own chess variant in this comments section before this even though this is the comments section of my own profile so I felt like sharing this abomination I created in 2021. YesWhy did I create this?
This one is nice to my opinion. It really looks like a chess pieces.
That was in reference to this image:
I replaced it with a new image today, which I think looks better and is less cluttered with surrounding pieces.
This is the only ID where the ID seems to undervalue Rose. Other IDs assign Rose at higher values.
Since I changed the AI image for this piece, here is the old one for comparison:
This is the only ID where the ID seems to undervalue Rose. Other IDs assign Rose at higher values.
This is probably because it is not really a Rose (which can make up to 7 Knight jumps), but a Half-Rose, which can only do up to 4. I suppose the other Diagrams you refer to use genuine Roses.
Edit: I see now that it is already nominated as "Knight-Relay Chess", so this becomes a second to that.
Original nomination, gives the name where the variant can be found here:
Here's another nomination for a featured CV:
N-Relay Chess
for popularising the idea of additional moves and captures by Relay.
Is it possible to rename the tag "Piece:Berolina Pawn" to "Piece:Pawn:Berolina"? I have already added some children to Piece:Pawn and it would fit perfectly there, IMO.
There is something wrong with the rating of Fischer Random Chess: In this list it is the favorite of 12, but on its page I count only 11 having it as a favorite.
It has also an extraordinary high score even it it was favorited by 12.
This is a late reply ... the bent riders that are not bent are in fact long known, problemists call them slip pieces (slip-R, slip-B, and slip-Q). The slip-R is also known under the name Panda and plays with this name in the S(w)eeping Switchers army for CwDA (2002).
Another late reply: Yes, before having an account here I signed by comments with "--JKn". Afaik, no one else did.
4-Knight-Jumps Rose shouldn't be half a ♟️ weaker than 6-Knight-Jumps Rose. They should be as close as B5 is to B.
No. The move zero rule is only to prevent an immediate tactical threat, but not a measure to correct the strength of an army. The additional tempi gained by the move zero rule are worth about one third of a pawn.
Great that you rediscovered the 135-degree-rose. I did not name it back in 2002 but I don't like the name "Worsen" – to me it only sounds like a verb with the meaning "to make worse; to become worse".
I suggest "Rose of Jericho" for this piece. The move pattern reminds me to the ball shape of that plant in dried up state.
HaruN Y rediscovered the 135-degree-rose recently and named it "Worsen"
https://www.chessvariants.com/index/listcomments.php?id=56364
I don't like this name, I suggest "Rose of Jericho" instead.
Charles Gilman explored those pieces and assigned some more names in the game "Commedia dell'Arte Chess"
I just noticed that piece I name Fischer here was used by Jason D. Wittman, 2000, Mad Chess. It is called Unicorn there.
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
Just for the curious: I accidentally found the original proposal of the Sweeping Switchers here:
https://www.chessvariants.com/ratings/-piececlopedia.dir-ideal-and-practical-values-4.html
It got refined with the help of the editors here.