Yes, it was that knight, the one with the four threeper enhancements. The fact here is that the knights enhancement is almost useless as a knight can go (3,3) in 2 moves anyway (NmG in Betza notation). And also it's too long. The point of this enhancement was not to have the same enhancement like in omega chess but I guess that one was the most interesting enhancement. Bishop pair matters of course. But this is the proper exmperiment I think as it is close to the real game (where you start with bishops on oposite colors). I think the elephant (who won versus the knight) would be closer to the bishop. I doubt any rock-paper scisors effects are in place in those 2 games. The elephant enhacement has a double role, it is long (not long enough to jump over board) and is unbounding.
Yes, it was that knight, the one with the four threeper enhancements. The fact here is that the knights enhancement is almost useless as a knight can go (3,3) in 2 moves anyway (NmG in Betza notation). And also it's too long. The point of this enhancement was not to have the same enhancement like in omega chess but I guess that one was the most interesting enhancement. Bishop pair matters of course. But this is the proper exmperiment I think as it is close to the real game (where you start with bishops on oposite colors). I think the elephant (who won versus the knight) would be closer to the bishop. I doubt any rock-paper scisors effects are in place in those 2 games. The elephant enhacement has a double role, it is long (not long enough to jump over board) and is unbounding.
Thanks for your help, H.G.