Ben Reiniger wrote on Fri, Apr 7, 2017 08:39 PM UTC:
First, my comment was generic, meant only as a response to your most recent comment; it would be up to Fergus (in charge of the Piececlopedia) to decide whether the Huygens merits inclusion there.
If not: you can submit your description as a Game, and before publishing I (or another editor) will change the page type to Piece. Presumably you will just use the Introduction, Pieces, and Notes sections of the form.
[Actually, we could also change the type to Piececlopedia if Fergus would decide it acceptable. But it looks like all but one Piececlopedia pages are hard html; Querquisite is the only one I noticed that was a database/MS page.]
There are 85 Piece articles and 144 in the Piececlopedia (counting repeats). Most of the Piece articles discuss more than one piece; many analyze pieces rather than introducing new ones. In searching for this information, I found something:
Fergus, the Link texts are misbehaving again (including the Primary-only search). Is this connected to your "game-centered" move?
First, my comment was generic, meant only as a response to your most recent comment; it would be up to Fergus (in charge of the Piececlopedia) to decide whether the Huygens merits inclusion there.
If not: you can submit your description as a Game, and before publishing I (or another editor) will change the page type to Piece. Presumably you will just use the Introduction, Pieces, and Notes sections of the form.
[Actually, we could also change the type to Piececlopedia if Fergus would decide it acceptable. But it looks like all but one Piececlopedia pages are hard html; Querquisite is the only one I noticed that was a database/MS page.]
There are 85 Piece articles and 144 in the Piececlopedia (counting repeats). Most of the Piece articles discuss more than one piece; many analyze pieces rather than introducing new ones. In searching for this information, I found something:
Fergus, the Link texts are misbehaving again (including the Primary-only search). Is this connected to your "game-centered" move?