John Lawson wrote on Thu, Jun 27, 2002 06:54 PM UTC:
I think Joseph is right. It looks like I missed exactly how points were
accumulated. I was thinking they would be assessed once, at the end of the
game, but assessing them at the end of each ply makes more sense.
Then missing Hunters might not be a disaster, because if you outplayed your
opponent, your score would eventually exceed his by 30 points anyway. It
would probably be undesirable to have two royal pieces.
This is another one of those games, like Nemoroth and Captain Spalding
Chess, where you need to spend days studying the rules to have a chance. I
love this stuff.