Larry Smith wrote on Sun, Feb 27, 2005 08:37 PM UTC:
Why does each Pawn need to be defended at the initial set-up?
This seems to be an arbitrary rule. There are many good Chess games where
each and every Pawn is not defended at the start.
In fact, these un-defended Pawns can create a nice area of early
contention in play.
Is there an actual 'flawed' setup, resulting in the loss of the game for
one or the other player?