Jared McComb wrote on Sun, Mar 27, 2005 01:45 PM UTC:
I didn't say your interpretation was wrong. I was trying to imply that
the n in funny notation does not really make sense when we apply it to
hippogonal pieces (such as the knight, camel, zebra, etc.) since it does
not intrinsically imply the unblocked path a piece must take.
By 'move' in my previous comment, I meant 'the device by which a single
piece may end the turn on a square different from the one it started on.'