Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Mark Thompson wrote on Sat, Jan 14, 2006 05:13 AM UTC:
'I also like the open-source approach (maybe make the raw data XML,
plain-text, or both), but there should also be one built-in to this site
as well, so if you don't have your own implementation you can view your
own.'

Sure, the site should have its own 'brand' of ratings. But I mean, it
would be good to make ratings from many user-defined systems available
here also. Just as the system allows users to design their own webpages
(subject to editorial review) and their own game implementations, there
could be a system whereby users could design their own ratings systems,
and any or all these systems could be available here at CVP to anyone who
wants to view them, study their predictive value, use them for tournament
matchings, etc.

Of course, it's much easier to suggest a system of multiple user-defined
rating schemes (hey, we could call it MUDRATS) than to do the work of
implementing it. But if enough people consider the idea and feel it has
merit, eventually someone will set it up someplace and it will catch on.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Game Courier Ratings

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.