Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Larry Smith wrote on Fri, Jun 9, 2006 11:09 AM UTC:
This does not determine whether a game is good or bad, only that it is
different from another.

And I know that the argument will be made that the Mad Queen variant could
represent a standard by which to evaluate other games. But that is merely
establishing a arbitrary baseline for comparison and doesn't determine
whether the games being compared are good or bad.

It could be argued that a game with very weak and very few pieces located
on a very large field might represent a negative. But this evaluation
would not take into account the in-game rules, such as Shogi drops.

The only claim that could be made is that this formula is able to generate
a given value for a game. The application of this value would probably be
best in conjunction with other considerations of the evaluated game.

I would be curious to see evaluation of Shogi and Xiang Qi in addition to
the Mad Queen variant. Since these three might epitomize the best in
Chess, their quantification and comparison may render some interesting
methods by which to evaluate other games. Though these games may resist
proper comparison since each have unique aspects.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Optimum design of a Chess variant

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.