Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Peter Aronson wrote on Fri, Jan 30, 2004 05:32 AM UTC:
The Triangulators sound interesting, but would not be able to attack pieces in or near corners. They also fail the clarity test. <p> As for the ring board, well, it helps Withdrawers as well as Long Leapers. But there's a more general issue. Rococo might have started as a design project to fix the flaws in Ultima, but the resulting game is: <p><ol><li> Not all that much like Ultima; <p><li> A good game in its own right with it's own style of play that differs from Ultima. </ol><p> In general, I don't think we'll really see an improved Ultima that will replace Ultima, but rather we'll see a family of Ultima-derived games, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. And I don't see anything wrong with that -- this site has hundreds (thousands?) of different Chess variants, and they don't really replace one another, but rather they are all available for the interested player. There really isn't any overwhelming need for a single perfected Ultima game, assuming such a thing is possible.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Rococo

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.